3/10/2023 0 Comments Hp photosmart a536 driver for macThis is what both ATI and Nvidia do with drivers on the PC, so it’s not a stretch that this would be the optimal situation for HP. Older printers out of support would be prompted that they aren’t compatible with the latest unified installer, and be directed to the older version. HP could fix this easily… come up with a unified Photosmart driver. So, you’re actually now better off having an older Photosmart since they have the newer driver. Now, how did HP botch this release? They forgot to issue 5.3.1 for all the Photosmarts that did get a Leopard installer initially. And, 5.3.1 has some nice perks, like a unified utility that lets you troubleshoot all the HP Photosmarts on your network (I happen to have two units in different locations). My Photosmart 2610v was updated to version 5.3.1. So, HP this month has issued drivers for those systems with a proper Leopard installer. One problem with that… new systems can’t run Tiger (not to mention the obvious lack-of-clean-install-choice). HP said that the workaround was to install Tiger, install the HP driver set, and then upgrade to Leopard. With the release of Leopard, some Photosmart systems didn’t have Leopard drivers. As usual, HP is botching a driver update for Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |